Tromml × EquipmentShare

Engagement wrap-up — two case studies

Sep 2024 → Apr 2026. What we did, what we found, and what's still useful after the engagement winds down.

Draft for client review · prepared 2026-05-28

The work splits cleanly into two arcs. The first was a diagnostic story — "why is direct revenue collapsing, and can we even trust the comparison?" The second was a productization story — "we keep doing these one-off analyses; how do we make them recur themselves." Each gets its own case study, in two versions.

For EquipmentShare's internal use

Detailed walkthroughs with the real numbers, internal table names, and platform-side implementation. This is the working version EquipmentShare's team can take with them.

For external marketing — needs EquipmentShare approval

Story-first versions written for publication — Tromml's website, LinkedIn, and sales conversations. Specific dollar figures, percentage changes, internal table names, and platform implementation details are stripped. Quote callouts are placeholders that will be filled from the engagement review recording.

About this draft

  • Audience: EquipmentShare leadership review. Numbers and dates are from the production work; happy to correct anything that doesn't match how the team remembers it.
  • What's missing: the verbal-only stories — including a draft-orders-to-Klaviyo automation we built that didn't get adopted for opt-in reasons. We left those off the page for review-call conversation.
  • Source code & data: all the work lives in Tromml/dbt-poc under ad_hoc/equipmentshare/ (analysis scripts) and datamonster/datamonster_dbt/ (platform models). Output CSVs, PDFs, and charts that were delivered live in the local DataMonster mirror.